This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this book Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McEwen, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McEwen, B.

Estrogen Actions Throughout the Brain

Harold and Margaret Milliken Hatch Laboratory of Neuroendocrinology, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT I. Introduction II. Intracellular Mechanisms of Estrogen... III. Estrogen Actions Throughout the... IV. Estrogen Actions on Midbrain Raphe... V. Estrogen Actions in Hippocampus re:... V. Possible Functional Significance VI. Conclusions REFERENCES

 
Besides affecting the hypothalamus and other brain areas related to reproduction, ovarian steroids have widespread effects throughout the brain, on serotonin pathways, catecholaminergic neurons, and the basal forebrain cholinergic system as well as the hippocampal formation, a brain region involved in spatial and declarative memory. Thus, ovarian steroids have measurable effects on affective state as well as cognition, with implications for dementia. Two actions are discussed in this review; both appear to involve a combination of genomic and nongenomic actions of ovarian hormones. First, regulation of the serotonergic system appears to be linked to the presence of estrogen- and progestin-sensitive neurons in the midbrain raphe as well as possibly nongenomic actions in brain areas to which serotonin neurons project their axons. Second, ovarian hormones regulate synapse turnover in the CA1 region of the hippocampus during the 4- to 5-day estrous cycle of the female rat. Formation of new excitatory synapses is induced by estradiol and involves N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, whereas downregulation of these synapses involves intracellular progestin receptors. A new, rapid method of radioimmunocytochemistry has made possible the demonstration of synapse formation by labeling and quantifying the specific synaptic and dendritic molecules involved. Although NMDA receptor activation is required for synapse formation, inhibitory interneurons may play a pivotal role as they express nuclear estrogen receptor-alpha (ER). It is also likely that estrogens may locally regulate events at the sites of synaptic contact in the excitatory pyramidal neurons where the synapses form. Indeed, recent ultrastructural data reveal extranuclear ER immunoreactivity within select dendritic spines on hippocampal principal cells, axons, axon terminals, and glial processes. In particular, the presence of ER in dendrites is consistent with a model for synapse formation in which filopodia from dendrites grow out to find new synaptic contacts and estrogens regulate local, post-transcriptional events via second messenger systems.

	I. Introduction

TOP ABSTRACT I. Introduction II. Intracellular Mechanisms of Estrogen... III. Estrogen Actions Throughout the... IV. Estrogen Actions on Midbrain Raphe... V. Estrogen Actions in Hippocampus re:... V. Possible Functional Significance VI. Conclusions REFERENCES

 
Most studies of estrogen action in brain have focused on reproduction. The majority of these studies have dealt with animal models in which evidence accumulating over more than 30 years has shown that estrogens target the brain of experimental animals (Pfaff, 1980). Now, medical science has recognized that the brain is one of the organs of the body that suffers from the loss of estrogen after surgical or natural menopause and that damage from stroke and neurodegeneration in dementia may be retarded by estrogen actions. Indeed, with increasing life expectancy during the 20th century, women are likely to live a substantial part of their lives in a state of estrogen deficiency. Although hot flushes are, for many women, the most-dramatic and noticeable consequence of loss of ovarian hormones, some women experience, at surgical or natural menopause, difficulties in remembering names and other information important for daily life as well as deficits in fine motor coordination and reaction times and feelings of depression and anxiety (McEwen and Alves, 1999). Loss of bone calcium and osteoporosis are other consequences that have led many women to take estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) at the menopause. Likewise, the loss of protection of the coronary arteries, leading postmenopausal women to increased risk for cardiovascular disease, is another result of estrogen deficiency that has reinforced the value of ERT. Thus, the somewhat-delayed recognition of the brain as an important estrogen target provides another compelling reason to investigate the value of ERT for states of estrogen deficiency.

Although most of the animal studies cited above focused on estrogen actions on the hypothalamus affecting ovulation and reproductive behavior, it is now apparent in animal models and clinical studies that estrogens exert many actions outside of reproductive function, including actions on brain areas that are important for learning and memory and for emotions and affective state as well as motor coordination and pain sensitivity. These effects reflect the actions of estrogens on a large number of brain areas outside of the hypothalamus, such as the midbrain and brain stem neurons that produce serotonin and catecholamines, spinal cord, cerebral cortex, and hippocampus. The problem in these brain regions has been to recognize the receptors and mechanisms by which estrogens produce their effects.

This review will focus on two aspects. First, the cellular and molecular mechanisms by which estrogens produce their diverse effects on the brain. Second, the brain regions and cell types in which estrogens produce their effects, emphasizing new knowledge regarding estrogen actions outside of the hypothalamus and pituitary gland. The serotonin system will be discussed as an example as well as the hippocampus. We will discuss the actions of estrogens in regulating synapse formation in hippocampus because they reflect a novel, nonreproductive action of estrogens related to cognitive function that is relevant for postmenopausal changes. Furthermore, these actions also illustrate the emerging evidence that estrogens act via mechanisms other than the classical cell nuclear estrogen receptors (ERs).

	II. Intracellular Mechanisms of Estrogen Action in the Central Nervous System

TOP ABSTRACT I. Introduction II. Intracellular Mechanisms of Estrogen... III. Estrogen Actions Throughout the... IV. Estrogen Actions on Midbrain Raphe... V. Estrogen Actions in Hippocampus re:... V. Possible Functional Significance VI. Conclusions REFERENCES

 
A. INTRACELLULAR ESTROGEN RECEPTORS
In the early 1960s, ERs were identified that bind to DNA and regulate gene expression (Jensen and Jacobson, 1962). Radioactive estrogens were used to identify ERs inside of the cell nuclei. The identification and mapping of cells that contain ERs were extended from the uterus and mammary glands to the brain and pituitary gland (Pfaff, 1980). At first, only ERs in the hypothalamus and pituitary gland were studied because they were the most obvious and also the most obviously related to estrogen actions on reproduction. Eventually, however, nerve cells containing ERs were recognized in brain regions like the hippocampus, cerebral cortex, midbrain, and brainstem. We are now aware of two types of intracellular ER, ER and ERß (see McEwen and Alves, 1999, for summary).

Measurements of mRNA for ER and ERß reveal distributions in the body that differ quite markedly from each other, with moderate to high expression of ER in pituitary, kidney, epididymus, and adrenal; moderate to high expression of ERß in prostate, lung, bladder, and brain; and overlapping high expression in ovary, testis, and uterus (Kuiper et al., 1998). Isoforms of ERß are now being identified (see McEwen and Alves, 1999, for summary). The best characterized of these splice variants is ERß2, as opposed to the originally identified isoform, ERß1. ERß2 appears to have a lower affinity for estrogens than ERß1, presumably due to an 18 amino acid insertion in the ligand-binding domain (Maruyama et al., 1998). There are other splice variants of ERß with differential expression in brain and other tissues, including a variant missing Exon 4 that does not bind estradiol in hippocampus (Price et al., 2000).

In brain, the distribution of ER is fairly well established but there is less certainty surrounding the localization of ERß. Autoradiographic maps of ³H estradiol uptake and retention in brain (Stumpf and Sar, 1976; Pfaff, 1980) are presumed to reflect binding to all forms of the ER, particularly the ER and ERß1 isoforms, which have similar, high affinities for 17ß estradiol (Kuiper et al., 1998). In situ hybridization data indicate widespread distribution of ERß mRNA throughout much of the brain, including olfactory bulbs, cerebellum, and cerebral cortex (Kuiper et al., 1997,1998). Results from immunocytochemical studies for ERß indicate a more-restricted localization of detectable protein, although the antisera that are currently available do not always provide specific signals in some brain areas (see McEwen and Alves, 1999, for discussion). Recent evidence shows good agreement between ERß mRNA levels and ERß immunoreactivity with a polyclonal antibody to the C terminus of ERß (Shughrue and Merchenthaler, 2001). In particular, colocalization of ERß mRNA with cell nuclear ERß immunoreactivity was demonstrated in the rat cerebral cortex, paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus, and hypothalamic preoptic area (Shughrue and Merchenthaler, 2001). Other brain regions remain to be studied for such co-localization.

The introduction of ¹²⁵I estrogen to label ER with a higher specific radioactivity has revealed the presence of binding sites not previously detected using ³H estradiol (Shughrue et al., 1999; Shughrue and Merchenthaler, 2000). In hippocampus, labeling was evident in the interneurons previously seen to contain ER by other methods, with higher concentrations in ventral hippocampus (Shughrue and Merchenthaler, 2000). However, the most important difference from ¹²⁵I estrogen labeling of ER was the detection of label in pyramidal cells of CA1–CA3 in the ventral hippocampus. In parallel studies of ER and -ß mRNA, there was a similar dorsal-to-ventral gradient as that seen for ¹²⁵I estrogen binding and the ER signal appeared to be stronger than that for ERß (Shughrue and Merchenthaler, 2000). Thus, the greater sensitivity of ¹²⁵I estrogen labeling of ER reveals sites that may indicate locations of estrogen actions in hippocampal pyramidal cells, particularly in pyramidal cell nuclei of the ventral hippocampus.

ER and ERß are similar not only in affinity for a number of estrogens and estrogen antagonists (Kuiper et al., 1998) but also in their ability to regulate genes in which the estrogen response element (ERE) is the primary site of interaction (Paech et al., 1997). The major differences between ER and ERß concern their ability to regulate transcription via the AP-1 response element. With AP-1, estradiol 17ß activated transcription with ER, whereas it failed to activate transcription with ERß and was able to cause inhibition. In contrast, with AP-1, nonsteroidal estrogen antagonists such as tamoxifen activated transcription with ERß and did so to a lesser extent with ER (Paech et al., 1997).

ER and ERß can form heterodimers when expressed in the same cells, thus giving rise to additional possible variants as far as gene regulation (Pettersson et al., 1997). Thus far, endogenous colocalization of ER and ERß has been demonstrated in the hypothalamic preoptic area, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, and medial amygdaloid nucleus (Hrabovszky et al., 1998) and probably exists in other brain regions, including midbrain raphe (see below).

Nonsteroidal estrogen antagonists exert agonist-like effects on some neurochemical or functional endpoints in the rat brain and antagonistic effects on others. Antagonistic effects for CI-628, a tamoxifen-like estrogen antagonist, were seen in terms of blockade of estrogen-induced progestin receptor induction and lordosis behavior (Roy et al., 1979; Meisel et al., 1987). Agonist-like effects of CI-628 were seen for induction of choline acetyltransferase in basal forebrain and repression of monoamine oxidase A in amygdala (Luine and McEwen, 1977). Recently, CI-628 was shown to block estrogen-induced synapse formation in the hippocampus without having any agonist-like effects (McEwen et al., 1999b; Brake et al., 2001).

One important implication of these findings concerning the mixed agonist and antagonist role of some estrogen antagonists is that nonsteroidal anti-estrogens, like CI-628 and possibly also tamoxifen and raloxifene, will not have uniformly agonistic or antagonistic effects on the diversity of actions that estrogens normally produce in the brain. This has implications for the therapeutic applications of such agents and requires a separate study of the actions of these agents on each endpoint of estrogen action.

Unfortunately, the molecular basis of these effects is not clear. Although anti-estrogens function as antagonists for ER and ERß via the ERE, these same anti-estrogens worked through the AP-1 response element to activate transcription via ERß also, to a lesser extent, via ER (Paech et al., 1997). Yet, with AP-1, estradiol 17ß activated transcription with ER, whereas it failed to activate transcription with ERß and was able to cause inhibition (Paech et al., 1997). Thus, to account for parallel agonist-like actions of estrogen antagonists, such as we have demonstrated for choline acetyltransferase and monoamine oxidase, it is necessary to postulate that ER is the receptor involved and that it uses the AP-1 response element where both estradiol and CI-628 can have agonistic-like actions.

B. NOVEL ESTROGEN ACTIONS VIA NON-NUCLEAR RECEPTORS
Rapid estrogen effects on neuronal excitability (Kelly et al., 1977; Nabekura et al., 1986) have been known for a number of years. Yet, only recently has this topic emerged in full force as an alternative aspect of estrogen action that involves interactions of ERs with second messenger systems and potentially novel types of ERs (Kelly and Wagner, 1999; Brinton, 2001; Kelly and Levin, 2001; Lee and McEwen, 2001).

The variety of nongenomic estrogen effects includes 1) rapid actions on excitability of neuronal and pituitary cells; 2) the activation by estrogens of cyclic AMP and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAP kinase) pathways that affect activity of such targets as kainate and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) receptors; 3) estrogen actions that involve modulation of G protein coupling and affect calcium currents and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) release; 4) effects on calcium channels and calcium ion entry; and 5) protection of neurons from damage by excitotoxins and free radicals (Kelly and Wagner, 1999; Brinton, 2001; Kelly and Levin, 2001; Lee and McEwen, 2001).

For estrogen actions on some aspects of calcium homeostasis, certain aspects of second messenger systems, and some features of neuroprotection, a novel receptor mechanism is implicated in which stereospecificity for 17ß over 17 estradiol is replaced by a broader specificity for the 3 hydroxyl group on the A ring ( McEwen and Alves, 1999; Lee and McEwen, 2001). On the other hand, there is also evidence that ER and ERß are capable of participating in second messenger cascades involving second messenger activation and G protein coupling (Razandi et al., 1999; Kelly and Levin, 2001). Besides ER and ERß, membrane ERs have been reported on pituitary, uterine, ovarian granulosa cell, spermatozoa, testes, and liver cell membranes. However, these have been only partially characterized in binding studies and only in a few cases have been shown to be linked to signal transduction mechanisms (for a review, see McEwen and Alves, 1999; Kelly and Levin, 2001; Lee and McEwen, 2001).

Finally, estrogenic compounds protect nerve cells from damage by excitotoxins and free radicals in novel ways (McEwen and Alves, 1999; Lee and McEwen, 2001). In this realm are neuroprotective effects that appear to be mediated via classical genomic receptors, based upon the fact that they can be blocked by estrogen antagonists. But other actions are not blocked by these antagonists and appear to involve a novel mechanism in which estradiol 17 is as potent as estradiol 17ß (Green et al., 1997; Lee and McEwen, 2001). These actions of estrogens, albeit in 100-nM to micromolar concentrations, reduce the production of or actions of free radicals in causing cell damage and promoting cell death through apoptosis. Mitochondria are major targets of estrogen action. Estrogen effects stabilize mitochondrial membrane potentials, prevent adenosine triphosphate (ATP) depletion, and reduce the generation of oxygen free radicals (Mattson et al., 1997; Wang et al., 2001).

	III. Estrogen Actions Throughout the Central Nervous System

TOP ABSTRACT I. Introduction II. Intracellular Mechanisms of Estrogen... III. Estrogen Actions Throughout the... IV. Estrogen Actions on Midbrain Raphe... V. Estrogen Actions in Hippocampus re:... V. Possible Functional Significance VI. Conclusions REFERENCES

 
We now know that ovarian steroids have numerous effects on the brain throughout the lifespan, beginning during gestation and continuing on into senescence. Estrogens participate in the sexual differentiation of the brain during early embryonic or neonatal life. These effects undoubtedly involve the classical intracellular ERs (McEwen, 1983; Auger et al., 2000). The process of sexual differentiation involves the secretion of testosterone in fetal or early neonatal life and the actions of testosterone either through androgen receptors or via aromatization to estrogen in the defeminization and masculinization of brain structures and function (Goy and McEwen, 1980; Naftolin, 1994). Although initially believed to be confined to the hypothalamus, structural and functional sex differences have been found in higher cognitive centers and in sensory and autonomic ganglia as well as structures of the limbic system of the brain and the midbrain, brainstem, and basal forebrain structures (for a review, see McEwen and Alves, 1999).

Estrogens affect areas of the brain that are not primarily involved in reproduction, such as the basal forebrain cholinergic system, the hippocampus and cerebral cortex, the caudate-putamen, midbrain raphe and brainstem locus coeruleus, and the spinal cord. These systems are involved in a variety of estrogen actions on mood, locomotor activity, pain sensitivity, vulnerability to epilepsy, and attentional mechanisms and cognition (for a review, see McEwen and Alves, 1999).

Functional or structural sex differences exist in a number of these brain regions (Fischette et al., 1984; Kimura, 1992; Bazzett and Becker, 1994; Witelson et al., 1995). For example, developmentally programmed sex differences in hippocampal structure may help explain differences in the strategies that male and female rats use to solve spatial navigation problems (Williams and Meck, 1991). A similar sex difference in spatial problemsolving is reported in humans (Kimura, 1992). During the period of development when testosterone is elevated in the male, aromatase activity and ERs are transiently expressed in hippocampus. Recent data on behavior and synapse induction strongly suggest that this pathway is involved in the masculinization or defeminization of hippocampal structure and function.

In spite of the paucity of ER outside the hypothalamus, hypothalamic preoptic region, and amygdala, estrogens have effects on many other brain regions and neurochemical systems involved in a host of nonreproductive brain functions. The expression of ERß mRNA in many of these brain regions has raised the possibility of functional ERs in these brain areas. At the same time, the presence of a few ER-containing nerve cells has led to the discovery, for example in the hippocampus, that these few nerve cells can have powerful trans-synaptic effects on neighboring neurons. As will be discussed in detail below, treatment of ovariectomized rats with estradiol 17ß induces certain hippocampal neurons to form new synaptic connections with other nerve cells. These estrogen effects appear to be attributable, at least in part, to intracellular ER in inhibitory interneurons (see below). In addition, the rapidity and structure-activity profile of some of these effects have raised questions about the possible "nontraditional" and even nongenomic actions of estrogens in some brain regions. For example, actions of estrogens on dopaminergic activity in the corpus striatum and nucleus accumbens appear to be mediated by membrane actions in the absence of any documented expression of either ER or ERß in cell nuclei of these brain regions (Maus et al., 1990; Mermelstein et al., 1996).

Estrogen actions upon cholinergic, noradrenergic, serotonergic, and hypothalamic dopaminergic systems, on the other hand, are likely to be mediated by known nuclear intracellular ER or ERß (see McEwen and Alves, 1999, for summary). This will be decribed for the serotonin system. The spinal cord also has intracellular ER and ERß but the reported effects on nociception and analgesia do not directly relate to those receptor sites in enkephalin-expressing spinal neurons. Moreover, endothelial cells and at least some glial cells must be considered as targets for estrogen action that affect glucose uptake and mechanisms that support the replenishment of cell membranes and possibly also synaptogenesis and other forms of structural plasticity (see McEwen and Alves, 1999; McEwen et al., 2001, for summary). We now will examine two systems involving actions of estrogens on brain areas that are involved in many functions beyond those specifically concerned with reproduction, namely, the midbrain serotonin system and the hippocampus.

	IV. Estrogen Actions on Midbrain Raphe and Serotonin Receptors in Forebrain

TOP ABSTRACT I. Introduction II. Intracellular Mechanisms of Estrogen... III. Estrogen Actions Throughout the... IV. Estrogen Actions on Midbrain Raphe... V. Estrogen Actions in Hippocampus re:... V. Possible Functional Significance VI. Conclusions REFERENCES

 
The serotonin system projects widely to many brain regions and is concerned with the regulation of many aspects of brain function, ranging from autonomic nervous system reactivity to mood, aggression, and cognitive function (Jacobs, 1994; Higley and Linnoila, 1997; Rubinow et al., 1998; Bethea et al., 1999). Ovarian steroids regulate the serotonin system of rodents and primates (Alves et al., 1998; Bethea et al., 1999), but important differences exist in the relationship between detectable intracellular ERs and the serotonergic neurons.

In primates, both ER and ERß are found in midbrain 5HT neurons and estrogens regulate tryptophan hydroxylase as well as progestin receptor expression (Bethea et al., 1999). In rats, ER is found in non-5HT neurons, where estrogen regulates expression of progestin receptors (Alves et al., 1998) but not expression of tryptophan hydroxylase (S.E. Alves, unpublished data). Sex differences are found in the ability of estrogen treatment to induce progestin receptors (Alves et al., 1998). In mice, both ER and ERß are present and functional in the midbrain. ER is expressed in 5HT neurons that also express progestin receptors (Alves et al., 2000). Yet, the ERKO mouse also shows estrogen induction of progestin receptors in midbrain raphe, implying that another ER, most likely ERß, is involved (Alves et al., 2000) (Figure 1).

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 1. Number of progestin receptor (PR) immunoreactive cells counted in the dorsal raphe nucleus (A) and median raphe nucleus (B) of wild-type (WT) and ERKO mice of both sexes. Estradiol benzoate (EB) treatment induces PR in both sexes of both genotypes. Although EB induces PR in both genotypes, the significant interaction between treatment and genotype in both dorsal (F (1,16) = 4.73, p < .045) and median (F (1,16) = 9.33, p < .008) raphe nuclei indicates that the magnitude of PR induction by EB over baseline levels was less in the ERKO animals. No significant gender differences were found. We conclude that another ER besides ER, most likely ERß, mediates the effects of EB in the raphe nuclei. [Reprinted with permission from Alves SE, McEwen BS, Hayashi S, Korach KS, Pfaff DW, Ogawa S 2000 Estrogen-regulated progestin receptors are found in the midbrain raphe but not hippocampus of estrogen receptor alpha (ER) gene-disrupted mice. J Comp Neurol 427:185–195. Copyright Wiley-Liss, Inc., a subsidiary of John Wiley & Sons, Inc.]

View larger version (31K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 2. Serotonin 5HT2A receptor binding in the cingulate cortex and nucleus accumbens of male and female rats after gonadectomy and treatment with either oil vehicle, estradiol benzoate (EB), testosterone propionate (TP), or dihydrotestosterone (DHT). These two brain areas are not normally considered to be estrogen or androgen target areas but the post-synaptic 5HT2A receptor levels are elevated in both males and females by EB (^ p < .005) and in males by TP (# p < .05 for cingulate; ^ p < .005 for accumbens) but not by DHT. There is a significant effect of gonadectomy in males (p < .05). This suggests that estrogens work equally in both sexes and the aromatase pathway may be involved in the TP effects, although the nature of the ERs that mediate these effects remains uncertain. [Redrawn from Sumner BEH, Fink G 1998 Testosterone as well as estrogen increases serotonin2A receptor mRNA and binding site densities in the male rat brain. Mol Brain Res 59:205–214.]

	V. Estrogen Actions in Hippocampus re: Cognitive Function and Memory Processes

TOP ABSTRACT I. Introduction II. Intracellular Mechanisms of Estrogen... III. Estrogen Actions Throughout the... IV. Estrogen Actions on Midbrain Raphe... V. Estrogen Actions in Hippocampus re:... V. Possible Functional Significance VI. Conclusions REFERENCES

 
The hippocampus is a brain region that is involved in episodic, declarative, contextual, and spatial learning and memory as well as serving as a component in the control of autonomic and vegetative functions such as ACTH secretion (Jacobson and Sapolsky, 1991; Eichenbaum and Otto, 1992; Phillips and LeDoux, 1992). The hippocampus is also vulnerable to damage by stroke and head trauma and susceptible to damage during aging and repeated stress (Sapolsky, 1992). Among the most novel and fascinating effects of estrogen are those on cognitive function. Estrogen effects on memory have been reported in animal models and in studies on humans (McEwen and Alves, 1999). The memories affected are ones in which the hippocampus plays a role along with the basal forebrain cholinergic system and other neurochemical systems. Rather than one estrogen-regulated process, many types of estrogen actions on a number of neurochemical and neuroanatomical substrates and a number of molecular mechanisms are likely to underlie the actions of estrogens on cognition and other aspects of behavior such as mood, pain perception, and nociception.

One of the processes regulated by ovarian hormones is the cyclic formation and breakdown of excitatory synapses in the hippocampus (Woolley et al., 1990). This finding was surprising because the hippocampus is a brain region in which cell nuclear ERs are present in scattered inhibitory interneurons but not in principal neurons where synapse formation occurs (Weiland et al., 1997). Yet, the effects of ovarian hormones on synaptic turnover were as impressive in the hippocampus as those in the ventromedial hypothalamus (Carrer and Aoki, 1982; Frankfurt et al., 1990; Calizo and Flanagan-Cato, 2000), a classic estrogen target area of the brain for female sexual behavior (Pfaff, 1980).

A. MECHANISM OF EXCITATORY SYNAPSE FORMATION IN THE HIPPOCAMPUS
Estrogen treatment increases dendritic spine density on CA1 pyramidal neurons. As observed by electron microscopy, treatment of ovariectomized adult rats with estrogen also induces new synapses on spines and not on dendritic shafts of CA1 neurons (Woolley and McEwen, 1992). Estrogen did not effect dendritic length or branching (Gould et al., 1990; Woolley et al., 1990; Woolley and McEwen, 1992). Progesterone treatment acutely enhances spine formation. But, over a 12- to 24-hour period, progesterone caused the downregulation of estrogen-induced synapses (Gould et al., 1990; Woolley and McEwen, 1993).

Estrogens do not act alone and, in fact, ongoing excitatory neurotransmission is required for synapse induction, as shown by the finding that antagonists of NMDA receptors block estrogen-induced synaptogenesis on dendritic spines in ovariectomized female rats (Woolley and McEwen, 1994). Because estrogen treatment increases the density of NMDA receptors in the CA1 region of the hippocampus (Weiland, 1992; Woolley et al., 1997), the activation of NMDA receptors by glutamate is an essential factor in causing new excitatory synapses to develop.

Spines are occupied by asymmetric, excitatory synapses and are sites of Ca²⁺ ion accumulation and contain NMDA receptors (Horner, 1993). NMDA receptors are expressed in large amounts in CA1 pyramidal neurons and can be imaged by conventional immunocytochemistry as well as by confocal imaging, in which individual dendrites and spines can be studied for co-localization with other markers (Gazzaley et al., 1996). Confocal microscopic imaging showed that estrogen treatment upregulates immunoreactivity for the largest NMDA receptor subunit, NR1, on dendrites and cell bodies of CA1 pyramidal neurons, whereas NR1 mRNA levels did not change after estrogen treatment that induces new synapses (Gazzaley et al., 1996). This suggests the possibility that NR1 expression is regulated post-transcriptionally by estrogen.

Recent evidence indicates that in young female rats, estrogen induction of NR1 is proportional to the induction of new spines, so that NMDA receptor density per spine is not increased; however, in the aging female rat, there is NR1 induction without an increase in dendritic spines (Adams et al., 2001) (Figure 3). This might make the aging hippocampus more vulnerable to excitotoxic damage, for example, by stroke or seizures.

View larger version (22K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 3. Young adult female rats show upregulation of both NMDA receptors and dendritic spines on CA1 pyramidal neurons in hippocampus, with a proportional increase of NMDA receptors and spines. In contrast, the aging rat hippocampus responds to estrogen by upregulating NMDA receptor R1 subunit expression but not by increasing the number of spine synapses. [Redrawn from Adams MM, Shah RA, Janssen WGM, Morrison JH 2001 Different modes of hippocampal plasticity in response to estrogen in young and aged female rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:8071–8076. Copyright 2001 National Academy of Sciences, USA.]

View larger version (90K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 4. Estrogen treatment of young adult female rats increases the number of dendritic spines on CA1 pyramidal neurons that are associated with multiple synaptic boutons (MSB), (i.e., more than one spine contacting a presynaptic terminal). Two examples are shown. On the left is a same cell bouton receiving two spines from the same cell that had been filled with dye to make it electron dense in the electron micrograph. On the right is a different cell bouton, where two different cells send spines to contact the same presynaptic terminal. Estrogen treatment increases preferentially the number of different cell MSBs. [Reprinted with permission from Yankova M, Hart SA, Woolley CS 2001 Estrogen increases synaptic connectivity between single presynaptic inputs and multiple postsynaptic CA1 pyramidal cells: a serial electron-microscopic study. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:3525–3530. Copyright 2001 National Academy of Sciences, USA.]

There are a number of presynaptic molecular markers of mature synapses that can be used in studies of synapse formation (McEwen et al., 2001). GAP43 is a marker of the growth cone and has been shown to increase in the hypothalamus after estrogen treatment; however, no studies of this type have been done on the hippocampus. SNAP-25 is a marker of synaptic vesicles, as are syntaxin, synaptotagmins, synaptoporin, synaptophysin, and the synapsins. Although mRNAs for these proteins are most likely found in neuron cell bodies, growth cones of hippocampal neurons in culture have been reported to have mRNAs for proteins such as GAP43 and Arc and perhaps other presynaptic proteins; these can be translated in the growth cone (Crino and Eberwine, 1996).

C. APPLICATION OF RADIOIMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY TO STUDY SYNAPSE FORMATION AND MATURATION
The methods used to assess synapse formation (i.e., Golgi staining, dye filling of cells, electron microscopy) are all labor intensive and time consuming and do not provide information about the underlying molecular events. Radioimmunocytochemistry is a method for assessing the locally expressed levels of synaptic and spine proteins using a primary antibody and a radioactive secondary antibody, then assessing levels of radioactivity using quantitative autoradiography. This procedure has not only confirmed the anatomical methods for assessing spine synapse formation but has also added a new dimension by providing insights into estrogen-induced increases in proteins that characterize presynaptic terminals and spines.

Figure 5 shows the results of the first study, using synaptophysin and syntaxin as presynaptic markers and spinophilin as a spine marker (Brake et al., 2001). Estrogen treatment was conducted exactly as in previous studies using the Golgi method and the estrogen antagonist, CI 628, was used to block estrogen actions (McEwen et al., 1999a). Estrogen treatment induced both pre- and postsynaptic markers in the stratum oriens and stratum radiatum of the CA1 region, location of the spine synapses (Brake et al., 2001). The magnitude of the increases corresponded very well to the magnitude of the changes in spine density seen with the Golgi method (Woolley et al., 1997; McEwen et al., 1999a). These effects were blocked by CI-628, which had no agonist effects by itself, and this finding agreed with the Golgi results (McEwen et al., 1999a). One unique finding with radioimmunocytochemistry is the estrogen-induced increase in spinophilin immunoreactivity in the hilus of the dentate gyrus and in the stratum lucidum of CA3, neither of which is accompanied by increases in the presynaptic markers, synaptophysin, and syntaxin (Brake et al., 2001). This suggests that there may be a process of synapse maturation taking place that reflects expression of spinophilin in the absence of any estrogen-induced changes in presynaptic proteins. Further studies are needed to confirm this interpretation.

View larger version (39K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 5. Radioimmunocytochemistry for two presynaptic (synaptophysin and syntaxin) and one spine-specific (spinophilin) marker reveals the same magnitude of up-regulation by estrogen treatment as has been shown by morphological techniques for dendritic spines on CA1 neurons of the female rat hippocampus. A 35S-labeled secondary antibody was used for quantitative autoradiography of the distribution and intensity of labeling of synaptic proteins by specific primary antibodies. Treatment with the nonsteroidal estrogen antagonist, CI 628, blocks the estrogen effect and does not produce an agonist-like effect of its own. These findings are very similar to a study using the Golgi method to reveal dendritic spines (McEwen et al., 1999a). [Reprinted with permission from Brake WG, Alves SE, Dunlop JC, Lee SJ, Bulloch K, Allen PB, Greengard P, McEwen BS 2001 Novel target sites for estrogen action in the dorsal hippocampus: an examination of synaptic proteins. Endocrinology 142:1284–1289. Copyright The Endocrine Society.]

Autoradiography with ¹²⁵I estrogen to label ER with a higher-specific radioactivity showed binding sites not previously detected in hippocampus using ³H estradiol (Shughrue and Merchenthaler, 2000). Besides the interneurons previously seen to contain ER by other methods, labeling with ¹²⁵I estrogen was found in CA1–CA3 pyramidal cell nuclei in ventral hippocampus. A similar dorsal-to-ventral gradient was seen for ER and ERß mRNA and ¹²⁵I estrogen binding. The ER signal appeared to be stronger than that for ERß (Shughrue and Merchenthaler, 2000). Thus, the greater sensitivity of ¹²⁵I estrogen labeling of ER reveals sites that may indicate locations of estrogen actions in hippocampal pyramidal cells, particularly in the ventral hippocampus. A recent developmental study of ER in the rat hippocampus is consistent with this and suggests that, early in development, more pyramidal cells may have nuclear ER than in the adult (Solum and Handa, 2001). Recent data with radioimmunocytochemistry have shown much stronger estrogen effects on synapse and spine protein levels in ventral, compared to dorsal hippocampus (Bulloch et al., 2000).

E. CELL-CULTURE MODEL OF SYNAPSE FORMATION
It has been possible to study estrogen-induced synapse formation in cell cultures of hippocampal neurons. In this model, estrogen induces spines on dendrites of dissociated hippocampal neurons in cell culture by a process that is blocked by an NMDA receptor antagonist and not by an AMPA (alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxasole proprionic acid)/kainate receptor blocker (Murphy and Segal, 1996). Furthermore, estrogen treatment was found to increase expression of phosphorylated cyclic AMP response binding protein (CREB). A specific antisense to CREB prevented both the formation of dendritic spines and the elevation in phosphoCREB immunoreactivity (IR) (Murphy and Segal, 1997).

The cellular location of ER in the cultures, resembling the in vivo localization, was in putative inhibitory interneurons (i.e., glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD)-immunoreactive cells) that constituted around 20% of total neuronal population. Estrogen treatment caused decreases in GAD content and the number of neurons expressing GAD. Mimicking this decrease with an inhibitor of gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) synthesis, mercaptopropionic acid, caused an upregulation of dendritic spine density, paralleling the effects of estrogen (Murphy et al., 1998a). Thus, estrogen-induced synapse formation may involve the suppression of GABA inhibitory input to the pyramidal neurons where the synapses are being generated (Figure 6).

View larger version (39K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 6. Because of the prominent presence of ER in some of the inhibitory interneurons in the hippocampus and the presence of similar ER-positive GABA cells in hippocampal cell culture, Murphy and Segal proposed a model of the control of spine synapse formation in which estrogen treatment suppresses the inhibitory tone upon CA1 pyramidal neurons and creates an environment conducive to the formation of new excitatory spine synapses. Blocking GABA inhibition and immunoneutralizing the neurotrophin, BDNF increased spine synapse formation in cell culture. [See text for details and references.]

F. NON-NUCLEAR ESTROGEN RECEPTORS
As compelling as the role of estrogen-regulated GABA input appears to be to the mechanism of synapse formation, we were not satisfied that there was no additional role for estrogen actions in the pyramidal neurons themselves. Given the increasing evidence for such a mechanism, it seemed plausible that, besides the indirect, trans-synaptic mechanism described above, local signaling by estrogen might be involved. This hypothesis was stimulated by a seminal study that ER and ERß into Chinese hamster ovarian cells found that both ERs are expressed in a form that couples to second messenger systems that are stimulated by estrogen and blocked at least partially by nonsteroidal estrogen antagonists (Razandi et al., 1999). Previous studies had indicated that non-nuclear ERs can be seen at the light microscopic level in cultured cells (Clarke et al., 2000) and also at the electron microscopic (EM) level in hypothalamus (Blaustein et al., 1992). The proliferation of articles on non-nuclear actions of estrogen via membrane ER and membrane-associated ER (Kelly and Levin, 2001) has reinforced the importance of investigating non-nuclear actions of estrogens in the hippocampus.

Electron microscopy was used to examine ER localization in rat hippocampal formation (Milner et al., 2001) utilizing four antibodies to different parts of the ER structure, two polyclonal and two monoclonal. The specificity of these antibodies was determined by preabsorption with the full-length ER protein, which abolished labeling in all sites examined, both nuclear and non-nuclear. We were able to see at the EM level the cell nuclear labeling seen by light microscopy in some GABA interneurons. In addition, some pyramidal and granule neuron perikarya have small amounts of ER IR in the nuclear membrane, which is consistent with a recent report that ¹²⁵I estradiol labels a small number of estrogen-binding sites in cell nuclei of hippocampal principal cells (Shughrue and Merchenthaler, 2000).

In stratum radiatum of CA1, around 50% of the ER-IR profiles were found in unmyelinated axons and axon terminals containing small synaptic vesicles. This is of potential functional relevance, given findings that estrogen can influence neurotransmitter release (see McEwen et al., 2001, for references). The synaptic ER-IR was found in terminals that formed both asymmetric and symmetric synapses on dendritic shafts and spines, suggesting that both excitatory and inhibitory transmitter systems are associated with ER (Milner et al., 2001).

Around 25% of the ER IR was found in dendritic spines of principal cells, where it often was associated with spine apparati and/or post-synaptic densities, suggesting that estrogen might act locally to regulate calcium availability, phosphorylation, or protein synthesis. Finally, the remaining 25% of ER IR was found in astrocytic profiles, often located near the spines of principal cells.

While these findings corroborate existing evidence for an indirect GABA-ergic mediation of estrogen actions (Murphy et al., 1998a; Rudick and Woolley, 2000), the close association between the ER-IR and dendritic spines supports a possible local, nongenomic role for this ER in regulation of dendritic spine density via second messenger systems. Initial in vivo and in vitro studies in hippocampus of one second messenger pathway, the phosphorylation of CREB, have indicated that estrogen has rapid effects that are evident within as little as 15 minutes to increase phosphoCREB immunoreactivity in cell nuclei of hippocampal pyramidal neurons (S. Lee, S. Alves, B. McEwen, unpublished data). One pathway by which CREB phosphorylation may occur involves the phosphoinositol-3 (PI3) kinase, or Akt, system (Datta et al., 1999). Studies are underway to try to connect these events together in the early actions of estrogen on hippocampal neurons that precede the induction of synapse formation. We next consider some of the cellular and molecular events associated with the formation of synapses in which estrogen actions may be involved.

G. DENDRITIC mRNA TRANSPORT AND PROTEIN SYNTHESIS
The finding of non-nuclear ER in dendritic spines compelled us to consider sites and mechanisms whereby estrogens could regulate the process of synapse formation via post-transcriptional mechanisms. Protein synthesis is likely to be an essential component of de novo synapse formation. Neurons have at least three strategies for activity-dependent regulation of protein synthesis and targeting of those proteins to pre- and postsynaptic sites (Tiedge et al., 2001). First, there is translation of mRNA in the cell soma and trafficking of proteins to "tagged" synapses. Second is transport of mRNA into the dendrites or growth cones and local translation into protein on polyribosomal clusters such as are found at the base of spines. The third strategy is local regulation of the translation of transported mRNAs (Tiedge et al., 2001).

Dendrites contain transported mRNAs for gene products such as MAP-2, CaMKII, NMDA R1 subunit, Arc, GAP-43, and BC1 (Gao, 1998). One feature of the regulation of translation is that the dendritic mRNAs are deficient in poly A; therefore, the regulation of polyadenylation by cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein (CPEP) is able to rapidly activate translation (Wells et al., 2000). Moreover, other regulatory points such as the initiation of the translation process via regulatory factors are subject to second messenger-stimulated phosphorylation (Gingras et al., 1999). These are currently under investigation in our laboratory as far as possible regulation by estrogen.

H. A MODEL OF ESTROGEN ACTION INVOLVING GENOMIC AND NONGENOMIC ERs
The results summarized above have led us to propose a testable, working model (Figure 7) that delineates possible sites of estrogen action in relation to the location of nuclear and non-nuclear ERs. Although this model pertains to ER because we know more about its distribution, further studies of ERß may reveal that it is present in non-nuclear as well as cell nuclear sites within the hippocampus and may participate in some of the processes outlined in Figure 7. According to our model, ER in the dendritic spine may be associated with the activation of mRNA translation from polyribosomes (Tiedge et al., 2001) or endomembrane structures found in spines (Pierce et al., 2000). In addition, other second messenger signaling effects might include the phosphorylation of neurotransmitter receptors or ion channels. ERs in certain presynaptic terminals might modulate neurotransmitter release or reuptake (see McEwen et al., 2001, for references). Moreover, ER-mediated activation of second messenger systems in dendritic spines and presynaptic endings might lead to retrograde signal transduction back to the cell nucleus, perhaps via Akt or CREB, providing another pathway through which estrogen could regulate gene expression. As indicated at the bottom right of Figure 7, we consider that these postulated actions of estrogen operate synergistically with the actions of estrogen via nuclear receptors in interneurons that modulate the inhibitory tone upon the CA1 pyramidal neurons where synapse formation occurs.

View larger version (34K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 7. Schematic depiction of an overall model of estrogen (E) regulation of spine synapse formation, based upon the model shown in Figure 6, combined with ER localization in non-nuclear sites in CA1 pyramidal neurons that respond to E with synapse formation. As summarized in the text, ER immunoreactivity is found in dendrites, presynaptic terminals, glia, and the nuclear envelope of some principal cells as well as in cell nuclei of inhibitory interneurons (Milner et al., 2001). Glia may be involved in synapse formation and/or removal. The left side of the figure highlights the fact that dendrites are sites of protein synthesis on polyribosomes and at endomembrane structures using RNAs transported from the cell body (see text). Non-nuclear ER may be involved in other E effects linked to second messenger activation on processes such as neurotransmitter release (top of figure) and phosphorylation of neurotransmitter receptors and ion channels. Second messenger activation by E in nerve terminals, dendrites, and glial cell processes may result in retrograde second messenger signals, such as P-CREB and P-Akt, that return to signal the genome. These actions synergize with the transient decrease in GABA-inhibitory tone produced by estrogen actions on ER-containing inhibitory interneurons based upon the model in Figure 6.

	V. Possible Functional Significance

TOP ABSTRACT I. Introduction II. Intracellular Mechanisms of Estrogen... III. Estrogen Actions Throughout the... IV. Estrogen Actions on Midbrain Raphe... V. Estrogen Actions in Hippocampus re:... V. Possible Functional Significance VI. Conclusions REFERENCES

Besides affecting neuronal activity in hippocampus, estrogen treatment affects hippocampal-dependent learning and memory. In the natural estrous cycle of the female rat, a recent study has utilized a delayed matching-to-place task in female rats to show a close parallel between the temporal conditions by which estrogen improves memory and the conditions for it to induce new excitatory synaptic connections in the hippocampus (McEwen et al., 2001). Moreover, estrogen treatment of ovariectomized female rats has been reported to improve acquisition on a radial maze task as well as in a reinforced T-maze alternation task (Fader et al., 1998; Daniel et al., 1999). Furthermore, sustained treatment is reported to improve performance in a working memory task (O’Neal et al., 1996) as well as in the radial-arm maze (Luine et al., 1998; Daniel et al., 1999). Finally, the effects of estrogen replacement in rats are reminiscent of the effects of treatment in women whose estrogen levels have been suppressed by a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist used to shrink the size of fibroids prior to surgery (Sherwin and Tulandi, 1996).

In addition to the delayed effects of estrogens in hippocampus, estrogens and some form of ER are involved in local signaling within neurons. Among the possible targets of local signaling is the translation of RNAs found in dendrites of hippocampal and other neurons. There are at least three other targets for local signaling by estrogens. They are 1) the rapid activation of kainate-induced ion currents via a G protein-coupled ER that is present in ERKO mice and is insensitive to nonsteroidal estrogen antagonists (Gu et al., 1999); 2) the suppression of calcium ion currents that is mimicked by a nonsteroidal estrogen antagonist (Mermelstein et al., 1996); and 3) rapid actions of estradiol on NMDA receptor activity and LTP (Teyler et al., 1980; Foy et al., 1999).

	VI. Conclusions

TOP ABSTRACT I. Introduction II. Intracellular Mechanisms of Estrogen... III. Estrogen Actions Throughout the... IV. Estrogen Actions on Midbrain Raphe... V. Estrogen Actions in Hippocampus re:... V. Possible Functional Significance VI. Conclusions REFERENCES

 
It is abundantly clear that estrogen actions in brain and other tissues involve an array of cellular and molecular mechanisms and that estrogens influence many behavioral and physiological processes that go beyond their traditional role in reproduction. Brain regions such as the hippocampus are affected by estrogens, even though they have a paucity of cell nuclear ERs. These actions may be explained by the powerful trans-synaptic influence of a small number of ER-containing cells upon other neurons (e.g., GABA inhibitory neurons depicted in Figure 6) or by non-nuclear ERs and second messenger activation, or a combination of both. Elsewhere in the nervous system, cell nuclear ERß may well help explain estrogen actions in other brain areas that do not express ER. What all of this means is that, besides the classical genomic actions of estradiol that have been studied for over 40 years, the molecular mechanisms of estrogen action are likely to involve many pathways not ordinarily considered, in which indirect genomic activation may occur as a consequence of second messenger activation.

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT I. Introduction II. Intracellular Mechanisms of Estrogen... III. Estrogen Actions Throughout the... IV. Estrogen Actions on Midbrain Raphe... V. Estrogen Actions in Hippocampus re:... V. Possible Functional Significance VI. Conclusions REFERENCES

 

Adams MM, Shah RA, Janssen WGM, Morrison JH 2001 Different modes of hippocampal plasticity in response to estrogen in young and aged female rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 8071–8076[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Allen PB, Ouimet CC, Greengard P 1997 Spinophilin, a novel protein phosphatase 1 binding protein localized to dendritic spines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 9956–9961[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Alves S, Weiland NG, Hayashi S, McEwen B 1998 Immunocytochemical localization of nuclear estrogen receptors and progestin receptors within the dorsal raphe nucleus. J Comp Neurol 391: 322–334[Medline]
Alves SE, McEwen BS, Hayashi S, Korach KS, Pfaff DW, Ogawa S 2000 Estrogen-regulated progestin receptors are found in the midbrain raphe but not hippocampus of estrogen receptor alpha (ER) gene-disrupted mice. J Comp Neurol 427: 185–195[CrossRef][Medline]
Auger AP, Tetel MJ, McCarthy MM 2000 Steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) mediates the development of sex-specific brain morphology and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 7551–7555[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Bazzett TJ, Becker JB 1994 Sex differences in the rapid and acute effects of estrogen on striatal D dopamine receptor binding. Brain Res 637: 163–172[CrossRef][Medline]
Bethea CL, Pecins-Thompson M, Schutzer WE, Gundlah CLZN 1999 Ovarian steroids and serotonin neural function. Mol Neurobiol 18: 87–123
Blaustein JD, Lehman MN, Turcotte JC, Greene G 1992 Estrogen receptors in dendrites and axon terminals in guinea pig hypothalamus. Endocrinology 131: 281–290[Abstract]
Brake WG, Alves SE, Dunlop JC, Lee SJ, Bulloch K, Allen PB, Greengard P, McEwen BS 2001 Novel target sites for estrogen action in the dorsal hippocampus: an examination of synaptic proteins. Endocrinology 142: 1284–1289[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Brinton RD 2001 Cellular and molecular mechanisms of estrogen regulation of memory function and neuroprotection against Alzheimer’s disease: Recent insights and remaining challenges. Learn Memory 8: 121–133[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Bulloch K, Brake WG, Lee SJ, Patel A, Wolf OT, McEwen BS 2000 Estrogen increases synaptic protein immunoreactivity in the dorsal and ventral hippocampus of ovariectomized rats. Abstr Soc Neurosci 26(7.1): 4 (Abstract)
Calizo LH, Flanagan-Cato LM 2000 Estrogen selectively regulates spine density within the dendritic arbor of rat ventromedial hypothalamic neurons. J Neurosci 20: 1589–1596[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Carrer H, Aoki A 1982 Ultrastructural changes in the hypothalamic ventromedial nucleus of ovariectomized rats after estrogen treatment. Brain Res 240: 221–233[CrossRef][Medline]
Clarke CH, Norfleet AM, Clarke MSF, Watson CS, Cunningham KA, Thomas ML 2000 Perimembrane localization of the estrogen receptor protein in neuronal processes of cultured hippocampal neurons. Neuroendocrinology 71: 34–42[CrossRef][Medline]
Crino PB, Eberwine J 1996 Molecular characterization of the dendritic growth cone: regulated mRNA transport and local protein synthesis. Neuron 17: 1173–1187[CrossRef][Medline]
Daniel JM, Roberts SL, Dohanich GP 1999 Effects of ovarian hormones and environment on radial maze and water maze performance of female rats. Physiol Behav 66: 11–20[CrossRef][Medline]
Datta SR, Brunet A, Greenberg ME 1999 Cellular survival: a play in three Akts. Genes Dev 13: 2905–2927[Free Full Text]
Eichenbaum H, Otto T 1992 The hippocampus - what does it do? Behav Neural Biol 57: 2–36[CrossRef][Medline]
Fader AJ, Hendricson AW, Dohanich GP 1998 Estrogen improves performance of reinforced T-maze alternation and prevents the amnestic effects of scopolamine administered systemically or intrahippocampally. Neurobiol Learn Memory 69: 225–240[CrossRef][Medline]
Feng J, Yan Z, Ferreira A, Tomizawa K, Liauw JA, Zhuo M, Allen PB, Ouimet CC, Greengard P 2000 Spinophilin regulates the formation and function of dendritic spines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 9287–9292[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Fischette C, Biegon A, McEwen BS 1984 Sex steroid modulation of the serotonin behavioral syndrome. Life Sci 35: 1197–1206[CrossRef][Medline]
Foy MR, Xu J, Xie X, Brinton RD, Thompson RF, Berger TW 1999 17ß-estradiol enhances NMDA receptor-mediated EPSPs and long-term potentiation. J Neurophysiol 81: 925–929[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Frankfurt M, Gould E, Wolley C, McEwen BS 1990 Gonadal steroids modify dendritic spine density in ventromedial hypothalamic neurons: a Golgi study in the adult rat. Neuroendocrinology 51: 530–535[Medline]
Gao F-B 1998 Messenger RNAs in dendrites: localization, stability, and implications for neuronal function. BioEssays 20: 70–78[CrossRef][Medline]
Gazzaley AH, Weiland NG, McEwen BS, Morrison JH 1996 Differential regulation of NMDAR1 mRNA and protein by estradiol in the rat hippocampus. J Neurosci 16: 6830–6838.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Gazzaley AH, Benson DL, Huntley GW, Morrison JH 1997 Differential subcellular regulation of NMDAR1protein and mRNA in dendrites of dentate gyrus granule cells after perforant path transection. J Neurosci 17: 2006–2017[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Gingras A-C, Raught B, Sonenberg N 1999 eIF4 initiation factors: Effectors of mRNA recruitment to ribosomes and regulators of translation. Annu Rev Biochem 68: 913–963[CrossRef][Medline]
Gould E, Woolley C, Frankfurt M, McEwen BS 1990 Gonadal steroids regulate dendritic spine density in hippocampal pyramidal cells in adulthood. J Neurosci 10: 1286–1291[Abstract]
Goy R, McEwen BS 1980 Sexual Differentiation of the Brain. Cambridge: MIT Press
Green PS, Bishop J, Simpkins JW 1997 17ß-Estradiol exerts neuroprotective effects on SK-N-SH cells. J Neurosci 17: 511–515[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Gu Q, Korach KS, Moss RL 1999 Rapid action of 17ß-estradiol on kainate-induced currents in hippocampal neurons lacking intracellular estrogen receptors. Endocrinology 140: 660–666[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Gundlah C, Pecins-Thompson M, Schutzer WE, Bethea CL 1999 Ovarian steroid effects on serotonin 1A, 2A and 2C receptor mRNA in macaque hypothalamus. Mol Brain Res 63: 325–339[Medline]
Higley JD, Linnoila M 1997 Low central nervous system serotonergic activity is traitlike and correlates with impulsive behavior. Ann NY Acad Sci 836: 39–56[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Horner CH 1993 Plasticity of the dendritic spine. Progr Neurobiol 41: 281–321[CrossRef][Medline]
Hrabovszky E, Kallo I, Hajszan T, Shughrue PJ, Merchenthaler I, Liposits Z 1998 Expression of estrogen receptor-ß messenger ribonucleic acid in oxytocin and vasopressin neurons of the rat supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei. Endocrinology 139: 2600–2604[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Jacobs BL 1994 Serotonin, motor activity and depression-related disorders. Am Sci 82: 456–463
Jacobson L, Sapolsky R 1991 The role of the hippocampus in feedback regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis. Endocr Rev 12: 118–134[Abstract]
Jensen E, Jacobson H 1962 Basic guides to the mechanism of estrogen action. Rec Progr Horm Res 18: 387–408
Kelly MJ, Levin ER 2001 Rapid actions of plasma membrane estrogen receptors. Trends Endocrinol Metab 12: 152–156[CrossRef][Medline]
Kelly MJ, Wagner EJ 1999 Estrogen modulation of G-protein-coupled receptors. Trends Endocrinol Metab 10: 369–374[CrossRef][Medline]
Kelly M, Moss R, Dudley C 1977 The effects of microelectrophoretically applied estrogen, cortisol and acetylcholine on medial preoptic-septal unit activity throughout the estrous cycle of the female rat. Exp Brain Res 30: 53–64[Medline]
Kimura D 1992 Sex differences in the brain. Sci Am 267: 119–125
Kuiper GGJM, Carlsson B, Grandien K, Enmark E, Haggblad J, Nilsson S, Gustafsson J-A 1997 Comparison of the ligand binding specificity and transcript tissue distribution of estrogen receptors and ß. Endocrinology 138: 863–870[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Kuiper GGJM, Shughrue PJ, Merchenthaler I, Gustafsson J-A 1998 The estrogen receptor ß subtype: a novel mediator of estrogen action in neuroendocrine systems. Front Neuroendocrinol 19: 253–286[CrossRef][Medline]
Lee SJ, McEwen BS 2001 Neurotrophic and neuroprotective actions of estrogens and their therapeutic implications. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 41: 569–591[CrossRef][Medline]
Luine V, McEwen BS 1977 Effects of an estrogen antagonist on enzyme activities and 3H estradiol nuclear binding in uterus, pituitary and brain. Endocrinology 100: 903–910[Abstract]
Luine VN, Richards ST, Wu VY, Beck KD 1998 Estradiol enhances learning and memory in a spatial memory task and effects levels of monoaminergic neurotransmitters. Horm Behav 34: 149–162[CrossRef][Medline]
Maruyama K, Endoh H, Sasaki-Iwaoka H, Kanou H, Shimaya E, Hashimoto S, Kato S, Kawashima H 1998 A novel isoform of rat estrogen receptor beta with 18 amino acid insertion in the ligand binding domain as a putative dominant negative regular of estrogen action. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 246: 142–147[CrossRef][Medline]
Mattson MP, Robinson N, Guo Q 1997 Estrogens stabilize mitochondrial function and protect neural cells against the pro-apoptotic action of mutant presenilin-1. NeuroReport 8: 3817–3821[Medline]
Maus M, Homburger V, Bockaert J, Glowinski J, Premont J 1990 Pretreatment of mouse striatal neurons in primary culture with 17ß-estradiol enhances the pertussis toxin-catalyzed ADP-ribosylation of G_o,i protein subunits. J Neurochem 55: 1244–1251[CrossRef][Medline]
McEwen BS 1983 Gonadal steroid influences on brain development and sexual differentiation. In: Greep R, ed. Reproductive Physiology IV. University Park, MD: University Park Press; 99–145
McEwen BS, Alves SH 1999 Estrogen actions in the central nervous system. Endocr Rev 20: 279–307[Abstract/